John Rawls And The Veil Of Ignorance | Hammering Shield

We have to penetrate the veil of Maya (Ignorance) inherent in every being ...


The most striking feature of the original position is the veil ofignorance, which prevents arbitrary facts about citizens frominfluencing the agreement among their representatives. As we haveseen, Rawls holds that the fact that a citizen is of a certain race,class, and gender is no reason for social institutions to favor ordisfavor her. Each representative in the original position istherefore deprived of knowledge of the race, class, and gender of thereal citizen that they represent. In fact, the veil of ignorancedeprives the parties of all facts about citizens that are irrelevantto the choice of principles of justice: not only facts about theirrace, class, and gender but also facts about their age, naturalendowments, and more. Moreover the veil of ignorance also screens outspecific information about what society is like right now, so as toget a clearer view of the permanent features of a just socialsystem.

When any person is converted to God, then the veil of ignorance is taken away.

Is the Veil of Ignorance plausible

Rawls believed that the social contract be created from an original position in which everyone decides on the rules for society behind a veil of ignorance.

Homosexuality is definitely one of the most common subjects people are ignorant about.

The heart, upon which the veil now is; or the body of the Jewish nation, as in the latter day; when they "shall turn", or "be turned", by the Spirit, power, and grace of God, to the Lord Jesus Christ, and look upon him whom they have pierced, and mourn, and embrace him as the true Messiah and only Saviour: the veil shall be taken away; the veil of blindness and ignorance, respecting themselves, case, state, and condition, and the way of salvation by Christ; the veil of unbelief, with regard to his person, offices, and grace, and of error in points of the greatest moment and importance; then all the darkness and obscurity that is upon the books of Moses and the prophets, and which is now upon their hearts in reading them, will be gone.

Throughout history there are many examples of people who are ignorant about a subject and react violently or inappropriately towards others.

What is the original position and veil of ignorance? - Quora

An ignorance of true popular feelings, a rejection of the wisdom of the ages, and the perpetuation of ignorance on future generations (who would be so lucky—or unlucky depending on one’s point of view) is indeed ignorance—and it is John Rawls who pulls this veil of ignorance upon society.

Rationally Speaking: The veil of ignorance

The author does use the toulmin method and proves his claim based on the claim of evaluation. The author compared the difference of wearing a hijab or not wearing a hijab. After interviewing women wearing the hijab, there were many reasons for wearing the hijab. Clearly, these women have a very different view of the veil here in the west, where they are free to wear whatever they want, then the old notion of the veil with which I grow up, fraught with ancient patriarchal meanings as it was and still is in societies where it is required by law or through ferocious social pressure (Ahmed). I stood firmly and unquestioningly against the veil and the hijab, the Islamic head scarf, viewing them as signs of women’s disempowerment.

Veil of Ignorance - Lightspeed Magazine

This all tends to force individuals to parrot the pre-determined stances assigned to them—all while justifying those positions through the so-called “veil of ignorance”! As such:

The veil of public ignorance - ScienceDirect

The veil of ignorance situates the representatives of free and equalcitizens fairly with respect to one another. No party can press foragreement on principles that will arbitrarily favor the particularcitizen they represent, because no party knows the specific attributesof the citizen they represent. The situation of the parties thusembodies reasonable conditions, within which the parties can make arational agreement. Each party tries to agree to principles that willbe best for the citizen they represent (i.e., that will maximize thatcitizen's share of primary goods). Since the parties are fairlysituated, the agreement they reach will be fair to all actualcitizens.